The Student Room GroupThe Student Room Group

Course name

Find a course

Search, shortlist and compare thousands of courses to find that perfect one.

Search for a course

Personalise your search by expected grades and more.

A-level explorer

See where your A-level subjects will lead you.

Where to study

See what makes a university special and discover where you belong.

Image from Architecture

Bachelor of Architecture (with Honours) - BArch (Hons)

Architecture

Entry requirements

Here's what you will need to get a place on the Architecture course at Glasgow School of Art.

We're still busy gathering entry requirements for Architecture at Glasgow School of Art. Look out for more info soon.

Tuition fees

LocationFees
England£9,535 per year
Scotland£1,820 per year
Wales£9,535 per year
Northern Ireland£9,535 per year
Channel Islands£9,535 per year
Republic of Ireland£9,535 per year
EU£24,350 per year
International£24,350 per year

Course summary

What this course is about

UCAS code: K100

Here's what Glasgow School of Art says about its Architecture course.

The Bachelor of Architecture (Hons) Programme is Part 1 ARB/RIBA accredited providing Exemption from the Part 1 ARB/ RIBA Examination in Architecture. As such the Programme establishes the foundational knowledge and skills to develop the required professional competencies in relation to ethical practices in the design of safe, healthy and sustainable buildings. The social purpose of architecture is at the core of the curriculum, informed by professional values including userfocussed design, climate literacy, and the responsible use of materials and resources.

The Programme duration is four years full time study or five years part-time mode of study.

Uniquely positioned within a wider community of artists and designers at the Glasgow School of Art the Programme offers students the opportunity to develop their creative practice while building their academic and social networks. In Stage 1 students collaborate with students from other creative disciplines within GSA, exploring common themes and outputs. In Stage 2 students undertake interdisciplinary collaboration with students from a selected design discipline within GSA. In Stage 3 students collaborate with students from the allied construction disciplines of engineering and quantity surveying.

The Programme ethos is delivered through a curriculum founded on tackling social challenges and the Climate Emergency, in the belief that architecture is a means to create positive change for people, places and our planet. Graduates will be both climate literate and climate numerate, able to make informed design decisions, supported by research and data, which address both the qualitative and quantitative aspects of climate change. Over the course of the Programme students are introduced to and develop a range of regenerative design strategies, including adaptive re-use, material provenance, circular economies, bioregionalism, climate adaptation and biophilic design. This is pursued through students' critical engagement with the environmental, social, cultural, political, economic and ethical issues shaping the built environment both presently and in the future.

The Programme is studio based, with studio activities informed by taught courses in Architectural Technology, History of Architecture and Urban Studies and Professional Studio, delivered holistically through a framework of six learning domains: Professionalism, Design/Create, Research, Communication, Skills, and Knowledge.

The curriculum is delivered primarily through studio-based design projects, enabling students to develop the core skills of architectural production through iterative design processes deploying the associated visual and verbal skills. The studio environment provides a forum for critical discussion, peer learning and support, where inclusivity is fostered through a mutually respectful, supportive and collaborative studio culture. Diverse teaching and learning methods encourage students to be curious, confident and above all independent in developing their personal responses to architecture and the environment.

The first three years of the Programme utilises Scotland’s landscapes, villages and towns as a design laboratory, focussing on the interplay of resourceful landscapes and human settlements, ranging in scale from island communities to town-scale urban environments with rural backdrops. Through study and design interventions in response to Scotland’s villages and towns, students learn how to analyse, evaluate and respond to a range of architectural contexts, in preparation for engagement with the city-scale urbanism of Glasgow in Stage 4.

On completion of the Programme, the primary aim is that graduates, as emergent designers, are highly competent and creative practitioners, and as graduates of the Glasgow School of Art, are engaged citizens, critical thinkers, skilled communicators, ethical practitioners and life-long learners.

Source: Glasgow School of Art

Course details

Qualification

Bachelor of Architecture (with Honours) - BArch (Hons)

Department

Mackintosh School of Architecture

Location

Garnethill Campus | Glasgow

Duration

3-5 Years

Study mode

Sandwich

Subjects

• Architectural engineering

• Architecture

• Building technology

• History of architecture

Start date

14 September 2026

Application deadline

14 January 2026

Glasgow School of Art reviews

(0)
Based on 0 reviews from Glasgow School of Art's students and alumni
5 star
0%
4 star
0%
3 star
0%
2 star
0%
1 star
0%
All reviews

Showing 0 reviews

National Student Survey (NSS) scores

The NSS is an annual survey where final-year students are asked to rate different aspects of their course and university experience.

The Architecture course at Glasgow School of Art features content from more than one subject area. Using the options below, you can see ratings from students who took courses in each of these subject areas at this uni

Civil engineering
Architecture
Building
History of art, architecture and design

Select an option to see a detailed breakdown

How often does your course challenge you to achieve your best work?

89%

med

How good are teaching staff at explaining things?

87%

med

How often do teaching staff make the subject engaging?

87%

high

How often is the course intellectually stimulating?

95%

high

To what extent have you had the chance to bring together information and ideas from different topics?

87%

med

How well does your course introduce subjects and skills in a way that builds on what you have already learned?

71%

low

How well has your course developed your knowledge and skills that you think you will need for your future?

76%

low

To what extent have you had the chance to explore ideas and concepts in depth?

92%

high

To what extent does your course have the right balance of directed and independent study?

78%

med

How well have assessments allowed you to demonstrate what you have learned?

89%

med

How fair has the marking and assessment been on your course?

87%

med

How often does feedback help you to improve your work?

71%

med

How often have you received assessment feedback on time?

84%

med

How clear were the marking criteria used to assess your work?

82%

med

How easy was it to contact teaching staff when you needed to?

87%

med

How well have teaching staff supported your learning?

92%

med

How well were any changes to teaching on your course communicated?

78%

med

How well organised is your course?

55%

low

How well have the IT resources and facilities supported your learning?

87%

med

How well have the library resources (e.g., books, online services and learning spaces) supported your learning?

87%

med

How easy is it to access subject specific resources (e.g., equipment, facilities, software) when you need them?

87%

med

How clear is it that students' feedback on the course is acted on?

71%

med

To what extent do you get the right opportunities to give feedback on your course?

76%

low

To what extent are students' opinions about the course valued by staff?

82%

med

How well does the students' union (association or guild) represent students' academic interests?

75%

med

Overall, I am satisfied with the quality of the course.

74%

low

How well communicated was information about your university/college's mental wellbeing support services?

89%

med

Select an option to see a detailed breakdown

How often does your course challenge you to achieve your best work?

89%

med

How good are teaching staff at explaining things?

87%

low

How often do teaching staff make the subject engaging?

87%

med

How often is the course intellectually stimulating?

95%

high

To what extent have you had the chance to bring together information and ideas from different topics?

87%

med

How well does your course introduce subjects and skills in a way that builds on what you have already learned?

71%

low

How well has your course developed your knowledge and skills that you think you will need for your future?

76%

low

To what extent have you had the chance to explore ideas and concepts in depth?

92%

med

To what extent does your course have the right balance of directed and independent study?

78%

med

How well have assessments allowed you to demonstrate what you have learned?

89%

med

How fair has the marking and assessment been on your course?

87%

high

How often does feedback help you to improve your work?

71%

low

How often have you received assessment feedback on time?

84%

med

How clear were the marking criteria used to assess your work?

82%

med

How easy was it to contact teaching staff when you needed to?

87%

med

How well have teaching staff supported your learning?

92%

med

How well were any changes to teaching on your course communicated?

78%

med

How well organised is your course?

55%

low

How well have the IT resources and facilities supported your learning?

87%

med

How well have the library resources (e.g., books, online services and learning spaces) supported your learning?

87%

low

How easy is it to access subject specific resources (e.g., equipment, facilities, software) when you need them?

87%

med

How clear is it that students' feedback on the course is acted on?

71%

med

To what extent do you get the right opportunities to give feedback on your course?

76%

low

To what extent are students' opinions about the course valued by staff?

82%

med

How well does the students' union (association or guild) represent students' academic interests?

75%

med

Overall, I am satisfied with the quality of the course.

74%

low

How well communicated was information about your university/college's mental wellbeing support services?

89%

high

Select an option to see a detailed breakdown

How often does your course challenge you to achieve your best work?

89%

med

How good are teaching staff at explaining things?

87%

med

How often do teaching staff make the subject engaging?

87%

high

How often is the course intellectually stimulating?

95%

high

To what extent have you had the chance to bring together information and ideas from different topics?

87%

med

How well does your course introduce subjects and skills in a way that builds on what you have already learned?

71%

low

How well has your course developed your knowledge and skills that you think you will need for your future?

76%

low

To what extent have you had the chance to explore ideas and concepts in depth?

92%

high

To what extent does your course have the right balance of directed and independent study?

78%

med

How well have assessments allowed you to demonstrate what you have learned?

89%

med

How fair has the marking and assessment been on your course?

87%

med

How often does feedback help you to improve your work?

71%

med

How often have you received assessment feedback on time?

84%

med

How clear were the marking criteria used to assess your work?

82%

med

How easy was it to contact teaching staff when you needed to?

87%

med

How well have teaching staff supported your learning?

92%

med

How well were any changes to teaching on your course communicated?

78%

med

How well organised is your course?

55%

low

How well have the IT resources and facilities supported your learning?

87%

med

How well have the library resources (e.g., books, online services and learning spaces) supported your learning?

87%

med

How easy is it to access subject specific resources (e.g., equipment, facilities, software) when you need them?

87%

med

How clear is it that students' feedback on the course is acted on?

71%

med

To what extent do you get the right opportunities to give feedback on your course?

76%

low

To what extent are students' opinions about the course valued by staff?

82%

med

How well does the students' union (association or guild) represent students' academic interests?

75%

med

Overall, I am satisfied with the quality of the course.

74%

med

How well communicated was information about your university/college's mental wellbeing support services?

89%

med

Select an option to see a detailed breakdown

How often does your course challenge you to achieve your best work?

79%

med

How good are teaching staff at explaining things?

88%

low

How often do teaching staff make the subject engaging?

80%

low

How often is the course intellectually stimulating?

74%

low

To what extent have you had the chance to bring together information and ideas from different topics?

84%

med

How well does your course introduce subjects and skills in a way that builds on what you have already learned?

61%

low

How well has your course developed your knowledge and skills that you think you will need for your future?

64%

low

To what extent have you had the chance to explore ideas and concepts in depth?

90%

med

To what extent does your course have the right balance of directed and independent study?

66%

low

How well have assessments allowed you to demonstrate what you have learned?

82%

med

How fair has the marking and assessment been on your course?

84%

med

How often does feedback help you to improve your work?

79%

med

How often have you received assessment feedback on time?

89%

med

How clear were the marking criteria used to assess your work?

72%

med

How easy was it to contact teaching staff when you needed to?

85%

low

How well have teaching staff supported your learning?

82%

low

How well were any changes to teaching on your course communicated?

68%

low

How well organised is your course?

55%

low

How well have the IT resources and facilities supported your learning?

81%

med

How well have the library resources (e.g., books, online services and learning spaces) supported your learning?

92%

med

How easy is it to access subject specific resources (e.g., equipment, facilities, software) when you need them?

76%

low

How clear is it that students' feedback on the course is acted on?

61%

med

To what extent do you get the right opportunities to give feedback on your course?

73%

low

To what extent are students' opinions about the course valued by staff?

73%

low

How well does the students' union (association or guild) represent students' academic interests?

66%

low

Overall, I am satisfied with the quality of the course.

67%

low

How well communicated was information about your university/college's mental wellbeing support services?

76%

med

Student information

The Architecture course at Glasgow School of Art features content from more than one subject area. Choose an option below to find out about the students taking courses in each of those subject areas at this uni.

Architectural engineering
Architecture
Building technology
History of architecture
Mode of study
Full-time97%Part-time3%
Gender ratio
Female55%Male44%Other1%
Where students come from
International22%UK78%
Student performance
2:1 or above42%
Number of students390
Most popular A-levels studied
SubjectGrade
MathematicsC
Fine ArtA
PhysicsD
EconomicsA
Business StudiesA
Mode of study
Full-time97%Part-time3%
Gender ratio
Female55%Male44%Other1%
Where students come from
International22%UK78%
Student performance
2:1 or above41%
Number of students390
Most popular A-levels studied
SubjectGrade
MathematicsC
Fine ArtA
PhysicsD
EconomicsA
Business StudiesA
Mode of study
Full-time97%Part-time3%
Gender ratio
Female55%Male44%Other1%
Where students come from
International22%UK78%
Student performance
2:1 or above41%
Number of students390
Most popular A-levels studied
SubjectGrade
MathematicsC
Fine ArtA
PhysicsD
EconomicsA
Business StudiesA
Mode of study
Full-time97%Part-time3%
Gender ratio
Female55%Male44%Other1%
Where students come from
International22%UK78%
Student performance
2:1 or above42%
Number of students390
Most popular A-levels studied
SubjectGrade
MathematicsC
Fine ArtA
PhysicsD
EconomicsA
Business StudiesA
Source: HESA

Graduate prospects

What graduates do next

Facts and figures about Glasgow School of Art graduates who took Architecture - or another course in the same subject area.

History of art, architecture and design

Graduate statistics

60%

In a job where degree was essential or beneficial

90%

In work, study or other activity

65%

Say it fits with future plans

55%

Are utilising studies

Top job areas

15%

Artistic, literary and media occupations

15%

Design occupations

10%

Elementary occupations

5%

Administrative occupations

Graduate statistics percentages are determined 15 months after a student graduates

Earnings after graduation

The Architecture course includes content from more than one subject area. Choose an option below for Glasgow School of Art graduate earnings across each of those subject areas.

Architecture, building and planning
History and archaeology

Earnings

£28.8k

Third year after graduation

£30.7k

Fifth year after graduation

Earnings

£17.9k

First year after graduation

Shown here are the median earnings of graduates at one, three and five years after they completed a course related to Architecture.

Source: LEO

Note: this data only looks at employees (and not those who are self-employed or also studying) and covers a broad sample of graduates and the various paths they've taken, which might not always be a direct result of their degree

Discussions

Mobile phone in hand

Glasgow School of Art socials

Tap these links to go to this university's social media channels

Glasgow School of Art open days

Are you thinking of applying to this university?

Before you do, it's a good idea to go to an open day. You can have a good look around campus, getting a better idea of what it's like to study there. You'll meet current students and staff and get the chance to ask them questions.

Universities will list upcoming open days on their websites. Most will also have virtual open days; these are a great alternative if you really can't get there in person. For tips on preparing for open days, check the advice section here on The Uni Guide.

Explore more courses at other universities

Heriot-Watt University

Edinburgh Campus | Edinburgh

Architectural Engineering

MEng (Hon) 5 Years Full-time 2026

University of Staffordshire

University of Staffordshire (Stoke Campus) | Stoke-on-Trent

Architecture

BArch (Hons) 3 Years Full-time 2026

Bristol, UWE

Frenchay Campus | Bristol

Architecture and Planning

BA (Hons) 4 Years Full-time 2026

Birmingham City University

Parkside Building Campus | Birmingham

Architecture

BA (Hons) 3 Years Full-time 2026

Oxford Brookes University

Main Site | Oxford

Interior Architecture

BA (Hons) 3 Years Full-time 2026

University of Nottingham

University Park Campus | Nottingham

Architectural Environment Engineering

MEng (Hon) 4 Years Full-time 2026

Anglia Ruskin University

Chelmsford Campus | Chelmsford

Architecture [with Foundation Year]

BA (Hons) 4 Years Full-time including foundation year 2026

University of Plymouth

Main Site | Plymouth

Architecture

BA (Hons) 3 Years Full-time 2026

Lancaster University

Main Site | Lancaster

Architecture

BA (Hons) 3 Years Full-time 2026

University of Kent

Canterbury campus | Canterbury

Architecture

BA (Hons) 3 Years Full-time 2026

0