Get degree ideas using our A level explorer tool

Postgraduate Diploma in Education (Advanced PGCE in Lifelong Learning)

East Riding College

UCAS Code: P52D | Postgraduate Diploma - PgDip

Entry requirements


Sorry, no information to show

About this course


Course option

1year

Full-time | 2024

Subjects

Education studies

Higher education

**Get into Teaching**

This 120 credit award is the ‘standard’ university level award for graduate teachers in the Lifelong Learning sector; following professional post-qualification formation it may lead to the status of Qualified Teacher Learning and Skills (QTLS). It contains 60 credits of study at honours level (HE level 3). It is at a higher academic level than the new level 5 Diploma in Education and Training but contains equivalent practical content.

The programme is based on five ideas as follows:

1. Reflective practice: working in post-16 education and training is both exhausting and exhilarating. Encompassing all educational provision – formal, non-formal and informal – anything that falls between schooling and universities, there a no pre-defined pedagogic models for trainees to assume. They emerge as professional when they are able to situate themselves within and critique the interconnections between context and how it is shaped by research, policy and practice.
2. Equity, diversity and inclusion: trainees may work in contexts as diverse as parents in a primary school or vulnerable learners in a high security prison; in multi-lingual and multi-faith inner city locations or mono-cultural rural communities. What defines post-16 professionalism is a commitment to education for all and the dexterity to move between these cohorts with ease.
3. Professionalism: post-16 education is a recently professionalised occupation and as policy unfolds its claim on this status is open to interrogation. It is not conclusive that post-16 teaching as a profession is either desirable or possible however, this programme aims to highlight the positive role of teaching in post-16 education and its wide ranging area of employment opportunities. Threaded through the programme is an exploration of what this concept means, how it has changed and developed and what its implications are for critical reflection and considerations of social justice.
4. Pedagogy, curriculum and assessment: trainees will explore and critique current issues as well as acquire technical competence in approaches to the three central concepts of pedagogy, curriculum and assessment. Exploring and critiquing rather than assuming the mantel of the ETF professional standards, they will appreciate distinctions between assessment of, for and as learning.
5. Collaboration: The programme will be developed through a process of close partnership working with feedback from trainees, mentors and employers. Our partnership model means that FE Colleges, as employers are fully involved in the setting up and management of provision. We work towards a common set of principles protocols and standards to ensure the programme has academic rigour and professional relevance.

Modules

Research Informed Teaching Learning and Assessment – This module aims to develop your understanding of how people learn in the Lifelong Learning Sector and of the role of assessment in enabling learning and achievement. It introduces theories and principles of learning and assessment and develops your ability to apply research evidence in designing effective learning and assessment strategies and materials. It seeks to develop positive approaches to the management of group and individual behaviours and promotes an inclusive approach to teaching, learning and assessment. It introduces the role of key transferable skills and the ways in which people learn English, Maths and digital skills. The module is assessed by means of a practical micro-teaching assignment and the design of an intervention, strategy, activity or resource, underpinned by an understanding of key principles of teaching, learning and assessment.
Becoming a Subject Specialist Teacher – The module reviews your practice as a trainee teacher. It explores your teaching values, knowledge of your subject specialism, and your knowledge and understanding of how you're learning to teach. You'll have the opportunity to learn how to identify and respond to students’ needs, and how to use suitable teaching, learning and assessment strategies to develop inclusive teaching and learning environments. You'll have the chance to evaluate your teaching effectiveness and develop as a reflective practitioner as well as engage in personal and professional development planning, against the appropriate Professional Standards, to recognise and develop relevant subject specialist knowledge, behaviours and skills. This will include further development of English, Maths and digital skills for you and your students.
Being a Subject Specialist Teacher – This module builds on previous generic and subject specialist development in two ways. Firstly, it contributes to your development of more advanced strategies and methods for promoting learning and, secondly, it involves a focus on specific specialist areas and the critical analysis of subject specialist pedagogy. The module seeks to enhance your ability to reflect critically on, and to evaluate, teaching and learning; by recognising particular curriculum and professional challenges; and by developing your ability to respond to these concerns in sophisticated, innovative and creative ways. Key learning activities of the module are practical teaching experience and the engagement with other specialists through collaborative practice. The module is assessed through a Teaching Portfolio and a Conference Paper dealing with teaching and learning in the specialist subject.
Policy and Professional Issues – The module will develop your understanding of policy and issues relating to professionalism in Lifelong Learning. You'll have the opportunity to explore the impact of policy on professional practice and curriculum developments, drawing on appropriate evidence to evaluate professional practice and discuss possible improvements. You'll also discuss key issues of professionalism in Lifelong Learning, including debates on reflective practice and a discussion of your own educational values and the extent to which these promote social justice.

Assessment methods

The approach to assessment is defined as

1) Varied and creative: we are working to enable students to develop both academic rigour and professional confidence which means offering an assessment strategy that does not over privilege a single mode of communication. Students are formally assessed through writing, presentations, posters, micro-teaching, video essay, blogging and whatever new modes of demonstrating knowledge and skill emerge as appropriate. The assessment regime requires this degree of flexibility to allow us to respond to unanticipated changes in our working environment, ensuring that trainees are equipped to manage these.

2) Re-contextualised: trainees work in an extraordinarily diverse range of contexts from formal FE colleges to a women’s refuge to hostels for the homeless. The assessment strategy therefore needs to be flexible enough to allow trainees working in each of these contexts to make a direct connection between their specific interest and concerns and the core competences required from an FE teacher. This implies an assessment that is relevant to the specific context while simultaneously broad enough to develop an awareness of unknown future contexts.

3) Balanced: in a time when the professionalism of teaching is no longer assumed we are committed to modes of assessment that encourage questioning and critique. It is important that trainees developing know-how is assessed but the context for the next few years equally demands that they have critical insight into knowing-what and why with a reflexive appreciation of where their own professionalism sits within knowing, doing and being.

4) Where there is more than one assessment method in a module, students who fail one assessment and pass the other(s) will only have to be reassessed in the failed component
The content is organised over four modules that incorporate both academic content and professional practice

The Uni


Course locations:

Bridlington

Beverley Campus

Department:

Education and Professional Development

Read full university profile

What students say


We've crunched the numbers to see if overall student satisfaction here is high, medium or low compared to students studying this subject(s) at other universities.

89%
Education studies
89%
Higher education

How do students rate their degree experience?

The stats below relate to the general subject area/s at this university, not this specific course. We show this where there isn’t enough data about the course, or where this is the most detailed info available to us.

Education

Teaching and learning

97%
Staff make the subject interesting
97%
Staff are good at explaining things
100%
Ideas and concepts are explored in-depth
100%
Opportunities to apply what I've learned

Assessment and feedback

Feedback on work has been timely
Feedback on work has been helpful
Staff are contactable when needed
Good advice available when making study choices

Resources and organisation

84%
Library resources
89%
IT resources
84%
Course specific equipment and facilities
79%
Course is well organised and has run smoothly

Student voice

Staff value students' opinions
Feel part of a community on my course

After graduation


We don't have more detailed stats to show you in relation to this subject area at this university but read about typical employment outcomes and prospects for graduates of this subject below.

What about your long term prospects?

Looking further ahead, below is a rough guide for what graduates went on to earn.

Education

The graph shows median earnings of graduates who achieved a degree in this subject area one, three and five years after graduating from here.

£14k

£14k

£15k

£15k

£19k

£19k

Note: this data only looks at employees (and not those who are self-employed or also studying) and covers a broad sample of graduates and the various paths they've taken, which might not always be a direct result of their degree.

Explore these similar courses...

Share this page

This is what the university has told Ucas about the criteria they expect applicants to satisfy; some may be compulsory, others may be preferable.

Have a question about this info? Learn more here

This is the percentage of applicants to this course who received an offer last year, through Ucas.

Have a question about this info? Learn more here

This is what the university has told Ucas about the course. Use it to get a quick idea about what makes it unique compared to similar courses, elsewhere.

Have a question about this info? Learn more here

Course location and department:

This is what the university has told Ucas about the course. Use it to get a quick idea about what makes it unique compared to similar courses, elsewhere.

Have a question about this info? Learn more here

Teaching Excellence Framework (TEF):

We've received this information from the Department for Education, via Ucas. This is how the university as a whole has been rated for its quality of teaching: gold silver or bronze. Note, not all universities have taken part in the TEF.

Have a question about this info? Learn more here

This information comes from the National Student Survey, an annual student survey of final-year students. You can use this to see how satisfied students studying this subject area at this university, are (not the individual course).

This is the percentage of final-year students at this university who were "definitely" or "mostly" satisfied with their course. We've analysed this figure against other universities so you can see whether this is high, medium or low.

Have a question about this info? Learn more here

This information is from the Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA), for undergraduate students only.

You can use this to get an idea of who you might share a lecture with and how they progressed in this subject, here. It's also worth comparing typical A-level subjects and grades students achieved with the current course entry requirements; similarities or differences here could indicate how flexible (or not) a university might be.

Have a question about this info? Learn more here

Post-six month graduation stats:

This is from the Destinations of Leavers from Higher Education Survey, based on responses from graduates who studied the same subject area here.

It offers a snapshot of what grads went on to do six months later, what they were earning on average, and whether they felt their degree helped them obtain a 'graduate role'. We calculate a mean rating to indicate if this is high, medium or low compared to other universities.

Have a question about this info? Learn more here

Graduate field commentary:

The Higher Education Careers Services Unit have provided some further context for all graduates in this subject area, including details that numbers alone might not show

Have a question about this info? Learn more here

The Longitudinal Educational Outcomes dataset combines HRMC earnings data with student records from the Higher Education Statistics Agency.

While there are lots of factors at play when it comes to your future earnings, use this as a rough timeline of what graduates in this subject area were earning on average one, three and five years later. Can you see a steady increase in salary, or did grads need some experience under their belt before seeing a nice bump up in their pay packet?

Have a question about this info? Learn more here